How to Think about Zeugmatic Oddness

Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-24 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Zeugmatic oddness is a linguistic intuition of oddness with respect to an instance of zeugma, i.e. a sentence containing an instance of a homonymous or polysemous word being used in different meanings or senses simultaneously. Zeugmatic oddness is important for philosophical debates as philosophers often use it to argue that a particular philosophically interesting expression is ambiguous and that the phenomenon referred to by the expression is disunified. This paper takes a closer look at zeugmatic oddness. Focusing on relevant psycholinguistic literature on homonymy and polysemy processing and representation, I argue that there are two different ways in which zeugmatic oddness can arise. Philosophical upshots concerning zeugmatic oddness are then drawn.

Similar books and articles

Ambiguity and Zeugma.Emanuel Viebahn - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):749-762.
Note on Plato, Phaedo 105 A.F. M. Conford - 1909 - Classical Quarterly 3 (3):189-191.
Note on Plato, Phaedo 105 A.F. M. Conford - 1909 - Classical Quarterly 3 (03):189-.
Copredication, polysemy and context-sensitivity.Emanuel Viebahn - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (8):1066-1082.
Contextual blindness in implicature computation.Salvatore Pistoia-Reda - 2017 - Natural Language Semantics 25 (2):109-124.
Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions.Robyn Carston - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (1):108-133.
The oddness of corporate ownership.David E. Schrader - 1996 - Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (2):104-127.
Considering Intentions in Decision Making: What Is So Odd about It?Anton Markoč - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):481-498.
Oddness of the Number of Equilibrium Points: A New Proof.John Harsanyi - 1973 - International Journal of Game Theory 2:235-250.


Added to PP

283 (#72,246)

6 months
283 (#7,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michelle Liu
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Knowing How.Jason Stanley & Timothy Willlamson - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):411-444.

View all 28 references / Add more references