Instability, modus ponens and uncertainty of deduction

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):658-674 (2006)

Authors
H. C. B. Liu
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
Considering the instability of nonlinear dynamics, the deductive inference rule Modus ponens itself is not enough to guarantee the validity of reasoning sequences in the real physical world, and similar results cannot necessarily be obtained from similar causes. Some kind of stability hypothesis should be added in order to draw meaningful conclusions. Hence, the uncertainty of deductive inference appears to be like that of inductive inference, and the asymmetry between deduction and induction becomes unrecognizable such as to undermine the basis for the fundamental cleavage between analytic truth and synthetic truth, as W. V. O. Quine pointed out. Induction is not inferior to deduction from a pragmatic point of view
Keywords chaos  Modus ponens  asymmetry between deduction and induction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-006-0030-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,865
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Explaining Chaos.Lawrence Sklar & Peter Smith - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (2):289.
Explaining Chaos.Peter Smith - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
516 ( #8,158 of 2,266,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #355,373 of 2,266,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature