Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):658-674 (2006)

Authors
Huajie Liu
Peking University
Abstract
Considering the instability of nonlinear dynamics, the deductive inference rule Modus ponens itself is not enough to guarantee the validity of reasoning sequences in the real physical world, and similar results cannot necessarily be obtained from similar causes. Some kind of stability hypothesis should be added in order to draw meaningful conclusions. Hence, the uncertainty of deductive inference appears to be like that of inductive inference, and the asymmetry between deduction and induction becomes unrecognizable such as to undermine the basis for the fundamental cleavage between analytic truth and synthetic truth, as W. V. O. Quine pointed out. Induction is not inferior to deduction from a pragmatic point of view
Keywords chaos  Modus ponens  asymmetry between deduction and induction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-006-0030-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance.Max Born - 1949 - New York: Dover Publications.
Explaining Chaos.Peter Smith - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Readings in the Philosophy of Science.Herbert Feigl - 1953 - New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
527 ( #14,514 of 2,455,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes