Re-inflating the Conception of Scientific Representation

Authors
Chuang Liu
University of Florida
Abstract
This article argues for an anti-deflationist view of scientific representation. Our discussion begins with an analysis of the recent Callender–Cohen deflationary view on scientific representation. We then argue that there are at least two radically different ways in which a thing can be represented: one is purely symbolic, and therefore conventional, and the other is epistemic. The failure to recognize that scientific models are epistemic vehicles rather than symbolic ones has led to the mistaken view that whatever distinguishes scientific models from other representational vehicles must merely be a matter of pragmatics. It is then argued that even though epistemic vehicles also contain conventional elements, they do their job of demonstration in spite of such elements.
Keywords scientific representation  models  deflationism  symbols
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014, 2015
DOI 10.1080/02698595.2014.979671
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,830
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1968 - Bobbs-Merrill.
The Essential Tension.T. S. Kuhn - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):359-375.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Scientific Representation.Mauricio Suárez - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):91-101.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-12

Total downloads
68 ( #95,854 of 2,293,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #62,227 of 2,293,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature