The intuitive invalidity of the pain-in-mouth argument

Analysis 80 (3):463-474 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Reuter, Seinhold and Sytsma put forward an implicature account to explain the intuitive failure of the pain-in-mouth argument. They argue that utterances such as ‘There is tissue damage / a pain / an inflammation in my mouth’ carry the conversational implicature that there is something wrong with the speaker’s mouth. Appealing to new empirical data, this paper argues against the implicature account and for the entailment account, according to which pain reports using locative locutions, such as ‘There is a pain in my mouth’, are intuitively understood as entailing corresponding predicative locutions, such as ‘My mouth hurts.’ On this latter account, the pain-in-mouth argument seems invalid because the conclusion is naturally understood as entailing something which cannot be inferred from the premisses. Implications for the philosophical debate about pain are also drawn.

Similar books and articles

Fish and microchips: on fish pain and multiple realization.Matthias Michel - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2411-2428.
Distinguishing the Appearance from the Reality of Pain.Kevin Reuter - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):94-109.
Not Only a Messenger: Towards an Attitudinal‐Representational Theory of Pain.Hilla Jacobson - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (2):382-408.
The Argument from Pain: A New Argument for Indirect Realism.Dirk Franken - 2016 - Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 86-2012 93 (1):106 - 129.
Knowing Pain.S. Benjamin Fink - 2012 - In Esther Cohen (ed.), Knowledge and Pain. Rodopi. pp. 84--1.
The Analogical Argument for Animal Pain.Roy W. Perrett - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):49-58.
Malcolm on criteria.Charles Sayward - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):349-358.
Pain and Mental Imagery.Bence Nanay - 2017 - The Monist 100 (4):485-500.
Constructing pain: How pain hurts.Yutaka Nakamura & C. Chapman - 2002 - In Kunio Yasue, Marj Jibu & Tarcisio Della Senta (eds.), No Matter, Never Mind. John Benjamins.
Pain and communication.Stan van Hooft - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):255-262.
The Social Pain Posit.Jennifer Corns - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):561-582.
Locating and Representing Pain.Simone Gozzano - 2019 - Philosophical Investigations 42 (4):313-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-11

Downloads
521 (#33,592)

6 months
146 (#20,721)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michelle Liu
Monash University

Citations of this work

The Polysemy View of Pain.Michelle Liu - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (1):198-217.
Pain, paradox and polysemy.Michelle Liu - 2021 - Analysis 81 (3):461-470.
A Hole in the Box and a Pain in the Mouth.Laurenz C. Casser & Henry Ian Schiller - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (4):pqaa091.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Unfelt pain.Kevin Reuter & Justin Sytsma - 2020 - Synthese 197 (4):1777-1801.
Mental Pictures and Cognitive Science.Ned Block - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (4):499--542.

View all 19 references / Add more references