Is There an Ontology of Infinity?

Foundations of Science 25 (3):519-540 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this article I try to articulate a defensible argumentation against the idea of an ontology of infinity. My position is phenomenologically motivated and in this virtue strongly influenced by the Husserlian reduction of the ontological being to a process of subjective constitution within the immanence of consciousness. However taking into account the historical charge and the depth of the question of infinity over the centuries I also include a brief review of the platonic and aristotelian views and also those of Locke and Hume on the concept to the extent that they are relevant to my own discussion of infinity both in a purely philosophical and epistemological context. Concerning the latter context, I argue against Kanamori’s position, in The Infinite as Method in Set Theory and Mathematics, that the mathematical infinite can be accounted for solely in terms of epistemological articulation, that is, in the way it is approached, assimilated, and applied in the course of the construction of mathematical hierarchies. Instead I point to a subjectively constituted immanent ‘infinity’ in virtue of the a priori as well as factual characteristics of subjective constitution, underlying and conditioning any talk of infinity in an epistemological sense. From this viewpoint I also address some other positions on the question of a possible ontology of the mathematical infinite. My whole approach to the question of the infinite in an epistemological sense hinges on the assumption that the mathematical infinite subsumes the infinite of physical theories to the extent that physics and science in general deal with the infinite in terms of the corresponding mathematical language and the specific techniques involved.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science, Religion, and Infinity.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 430-440.
El Infinito Matematico.Cañón Loyes Camino - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1295-1318.
Infinity: new research frontiers.Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Actual Infinite as a Day or the Games.Pascal Massie - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (3):573-596.
Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity.Graham Robert Oppy - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of the Infinite and the Crisis in Modern Physics.Steven M. Rosen - 1983 - Speculations in Science and Technology 6 (4):413-425.
Size and Function.Bruno Whittle - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (4):853-873.
The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.Philip Clayton - 1996 - International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):5-17.
Infinity for Marxists.Christopher Nealon - 2015 - Mediations 28 (2).
Philosophy as Therapy.Nikolay Omelchenko - 2010 - Diogenes 57 (4):73-81.


Added to PP

22 (#669,532)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stathis Livadas
University of Patras (Alumnus)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege.Michael Dummett - 1973 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Being and event.Alain Badiou - 2005 - New York: Continuum. Edited by Oliver Feltham.
Cognition and commitment in Hume's philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Set theory and the continuum hypothesis.Paul J. Cohen - 1966 - New York,: W. A. Benjamin.

View all 32 references / Add more references