Paul Livingston
University of New Mexico
Working through Balaska’s deeply perceptive, elegantly written, and profoundly honest book, Wittgenstein and Lacan at the Limit, a reader steeped in the recent academic literature about either or both of its main figures may come to feel herself placed at what is, itself, a certain kind of limit. The limit I mean is the limit of a familiar type of theoretical discourse about the constitution and structure of language and subjectivity as Wittgenstein and Lacan treat them: it includes the discourses that seek, for instance, to articulate how language and sense are constituted in the Tractatus, and thus what is really meant by “logical form” and “nonsense” there; or those that aim to comprehend the true relationship of our biological nature to language, culture, and the advent of freedom in Lacan; or, again, those that try to find, in either thinker’s works, the precise location of the delicate logical buttonhole that would alone permit us entry, from within everyday language and life, to the absoluteness of an ineffable beyond. These discourses all treat of language and life, but handle these phenomena at arm’s length, theorizing the structure of each and the form of their relationship in such a way as to establish, ultimately, their mutual convertibility to one another, their mutual absorption into a third, more inclusive term, or adduce translations from the dense theoretical matrices of one thinker’s treatment of them to the other’s. Balaska’s book, doing none of these things, rather succeeds in bringing out how an interconnected reading of the Wittgenstein of the Tractatus and Lacan may speak to and inform our response to a certain kind of experience that is characteristic for both thinkers, and typical as well of those moments and occasions of our lives in which we may find ourselves drawn to reflect on what meaning is and how we relate to it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15845/nwr.v0i0.3567
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and Husserl: Context Meaning Theory.Dr Sanjit Chakraborty - 2016 - Guwahati University Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):101-112.
The Philosopher's Baedeker: Wittgenstein's Tractatus as Guidebook.Kevin MacNeil - 2017 - Philosophical Investigations 40 (4):350-369.
What Does "Signify" Signify?: A Response to Gillett.Rupert Read - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):499 – 514.
Wittgenstein on Language, Meaning, and Use.Dan Nesher - 1992 - International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1):55-78.
The Primacy of Use Over Naming.Alok Sahu - 2019 - IOSR 24 (5):26-34.
On Wittgenstein's Kantian Solution of the Problem of Philosophy.Hanne Appelqvist - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):697-719.
Essays on Wittgenstein.E. D. Klemke - 1971 - Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
Wittgenstein on Meaning and Life.David Kishik - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (1):111-128.
Ethical Eliminativism and the Sense of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Edmund Dain - 2012 - Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 35:49-50.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #783,393 of 2,448,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes