Defining death for persons and human organisms

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):439-453 (1999)

John Lizza
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
This paper discusses how alternative concepts of personhood affect the definition of death. I argue that parties in the debate over the definition of death have employed different concepts of personhood, and thus have been talking past each other by proposing definitions of death for different kinds of things. In particular, I show how critics of the consciousness-related, neurological formation of death have relied on concepts of personhood that would be rejected by proponents of that formulation. These critics rest on treating persons as qualitative specifications of human organisms or as identical to human organisms. Since advocates of the consciousness-related, neurological formulation of death are not committed to either of these views of personhood, these critics commit the fallacy of attacking a straw man. I then clarify the substantive concept of personhood that may be invoked in the consciousness-related, neurological formulation of death, and argue that, on this view and contra Bernat, Culver, and Gert, persons have always been the kind of thing that can literally die. I conclude by suggesting that the discussion of defining death needs to focus on which approach to personhood makes the most sense metaphysically and morally
Keywords death  definition of death  persons  human organism  permanent vegetative state  persistent vegetative state  anencephaly  consciousness  Strawson  Wiggins
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009946723857
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death.John P. Lizza - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):45 – 64.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death.John P. Lizza - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):45 – 64.
Current Debate on the Ethical Issues of Brain Death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
The Death of a Person.David Hershenov - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):107 – 120.


Added to PP index

Total views
113 ( #73,967 of 2,280,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #314,348 of 2,280,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature