Huffington Post (2015)

Authors
Harold Anthony Lloyd
Wake Forest University
Abstract
This article explores problems with several definitions of Originalism proposed by Justice Scalia in "Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts." It begins by looking at Justice Scalia's citation of a possible statement by Queen Anne that Justice Scalia claims in itself justifies Originalism. Queen Anne may have told Sir Christopher Wren that St. Paul's Cathedral was "awful, artificial, and amusing" at a time when those words meant "awe-inspiring, highly artistic, and thought-provoking." Conceding that one must understand how Queen Anne meant these terms, this article shows how this example actually undermines Originalism when applied to on-going rules. It also explores inconsistencies and problems with several definitions of Originalism including Justice Scalia's arbitrary exclusion of technology from the constraints of "original meaning." It further disputes his claim that Originalism ". . .will narrow the range of acceptable judicial decision-making and acceptable argumentation [and that it] will curb -- even reverse -- the tendency of judges to imbue authoritative texts with their own policy preferences." This article maintains that Originalism has the opposite effect. Keywords: originalism, original meaning, Scalia, interpretation, meaning
Keywords originalism, original meaning, Scalia, interpretation, meaning
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Originalism as Faith.Eric J. Segall - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning.David Lyons - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):75.
Reading the Constitution: An Entanglement and Still Arguable Question.Cecilia Tohaneanu - 2010 - Romanian Review of Political Sciences and International Relations (1).
Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):682-702.
The Limits of Natural Law Originalism.Mikołaj Barczentewicz - 2018 - Notre Dame Law Review Online 93:115-130.
Constitutions, Originalism, and Meaning.Brian H. Bix - 2011 - In Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Essays in Constitutional Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-10

Total views
48 ( #206,908 of 2,403,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #62,167 of 2,403,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes