On Gillian Rose and Love

Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2008 (143):47-62 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contemporary American philosopher David Velleman recently noted, “Love is a moral emotion precisely in the sense that its spirit is closely akin to that of morality.”1 Although their kindred spirits are manifest, it is the tension between love and morality that at first glance is striking. Love seems to be supremely personal, unique to one individual and directed at another for highly contingent and possibly mysterious reasons. Even if Kantian or Utilitarian fantasies of objective morality are dismissed, the common alternatives that put emphasis on community values or obligation to the Other are still distant from an affect directed…

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vincent Lloyd
Villanova University

Citations of this work

The secular faith of Gillian rose.Vincent Lloyd - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):683-705.
Gillian Rose, Race, and Identity.V. Lloyd - 2015 - Télos 2015 (173):107-124.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references