Pluralism without Genic Causes?

Philosophy of Science 72 (2):334-341 (2005)
Authors
Elisabeth Lloyd
Indiana University, Bloomington
Abstract
Since the fundamental challenge that I laid at the doorstep of the pluralists was to defend, with nonderivative models, a strong notion of genic cause, it is fatal that Waters has failed to meet that challenge. Waters agrees with me that there is only a single cause operating in these models, but he argues for a notion of causal ‘parsing’ to sustain the viability of some form of pluralism. Waters and his colleagues have some very interesting and important ideas about the sciences, involving pluralism and parsing or partitioning causes, but they are ideas in search of an example. He thinks he has found an example in the case of hierarchical and genic selection. I think he has not.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/432451
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Major and Minor Groups in Evolution.Peter Gildenhuys - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (1):1-32.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
278 ( #17,502 of 2,312,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #10,647 of 2,312,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature