A Humean Argument for the Land Ethic?

Environmental Values 10 (4):523-539 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines an allegedly Humean solution provided by J. Baird Callicott to the problem of the is/ought dichotomy. It also examines an allegedly Humean argument provided by him for the land ethic's summary moral precept. It concludes that neither the solution nor the argument is Humean or cogent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
55 (#97,283)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Making and finding values in nature: From a Humean point of view.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):123 – 147.
Hume on Justice.Rosalind Hursthouse - 2010 - In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 264.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.David Hume & Tom L. Beauchamp - 1998 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 190 (2):230-231.
Desire as belief II.David K. Lewis - 1996 - Mind 105 (418):303-13.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.

View all 22 references / Add more references