Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):543-558 (1992)

Psychophysical scaling models of the form R = f, with R the response and I some intensity of an attribute, all assume that people judge the amounts of an attribute. With simple biases excepted, most also assume that judgments are independent of space, time, and features of the situation other than the one being judged. Many data support these ideas: Magnitude estimations of brightness increase with luminance. Nevertheless, I argue that the general model is wrong. The stabilized retinal image literature shows that nothing is seen if light does not change over time. The classification literature shows that dimensions often combine to produce emergent properties that cannot be described by the elements in the stimulus. These and other effects cannot be adjusted for by simply adding variables to the general model because some factors do not combine linearly. The proposed alternative is that people initially judge the entire stimulus – the object in terms of its environment. This agrees with the constancy literature that shows that objects and their attributes are identified through their relations to other aspects of the scene. That the environment determines judgments is masked in scaling studies where the standard procedure is to hold context constant. In a typical brightness study the essential stimulus might be the intensity of the light or a difference between the light and the background. The two are perfectly confounded. This issue is examined in the case of audition. Judgments of the loudness of a tone depend on how much that tone differs from the previous tone in both pitch and loudness. To judge loudness people first seem to process the stimulus object in terms of differences between it and other aspects in the situation; only then do they assess the feature of interest. Psychophysical judgments will therefore be better interpreted by theories of attention that are based in biology or psychology than those that are based in classical physics.
Keywords assimilation   attribute   brightness   context   Fechner   gestalt   integral stimuli   judgment   loudness   objects   pitch   psychophysical scale   sequence effects   Stevens
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x00069934
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - Dover Publications.

View all 92 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Perspective for Viewing the History of Psychophysics.David J. Murray - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):115-137.
A Parallel View of the History of Psychophysics.Gregory R. Lockhead - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):154-155.
Fechner's Impact for Measurement Theory.Michael Heidelberger - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):146-148.

View all 47 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Attributes of Complex Tones.W. H. Lichte - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):455.
The Effect of Interpolated Time Intervals Upon the Contrast Effects.M. G. Preston - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (6):706.
The Development of Context Effects in Half-Loudness Judgments.W. R. Garner - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3):212.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #298,673 of 2,446,622 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,908 of 2,446,622 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes