contemporaries, Bayle and Locke. Unlike Bayle, but like Locke, Leibniz argues that reason and faith are in conformity. Nevertheless, in contrast to the account that he finds in Locke’s Essay, Leibniz does not reduce faith to a species of reasonable belief. Instead, he insists that, while faith must be grounded in reason, true or divine faith also requires a supernatural infusion of grace.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Critical Philosophy and Post-Critical Faith.Patrick L. Bourgeois - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):431-450.
Locke on Judgement and Religious Toleration.Maria van der Schaar - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):41 - 68.
Philosophy Between Faith and Theology: Addresses to Catholic Intellectuals.Gregory B. Sadler - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):528-532.
Philosophy at the Boundary of Reason.Patrick L. Bourgeois - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:1-21.
Medieval Reactions to the Encounter Between Faith and Reason.James C. Doig - 1997 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):279-280.
Reason Informed by Faith.J. L. A. Garcia - 1991 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (4):507-511.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #177,669 of 2,172,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,023 )
How can I increase my downloads?