“Diagnostic Hedonism” and the Role of Incommensurability in Plato's Protagoras

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):241-257 (2010)
Abstract
The dispute over Socrates’ apparent endorsement of hedonism in the Protagoras has persisted for ages among scholars and students of Plato’s work. The solution to the query concerning the seriousness and sincerity of Socrates’ argument from hedonism established in the dialogue is of considerable importance for the interpretation of Plato’s overall moral theory, considering how blatantly irreconcilable the defense of this doctrine is with Plato’s other early dialogues. In his earlier works, Socrates puts supreme importance on virtue and perfection of the soul, so the puzzle apparent in the Protagoras merits a thorough examination. Several scholars have argued that, since Socrates’ defense of hedonism in this work clashes significantly with his views on morality in other dialogues, Socrates must only have been defending hedonism ironically, or with the intention of “diagnosing” his opponent’s point of view. In this paper, I examine the approaches according to which Socrates didn’t in fact mean to defend hedonism, but merely used it as a diagnostic tool; I argue that there is no compelling evidence for this resolution of Socrates’ defense of hedonism, and that the views that attempt to defend it really have no convincing grounds for it apart from the desire to reconcile the Protagoras with other Socratic dialogues
Keywords Socrates  Protagoras  Hedonism  Diagnostic Tool  Incommensurability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI croatjphil201010318
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Socrates, Pleasure, and Value.George Rudebusch - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Socratic Courage in Plato's Socratic Dialogues.Shigeru Yonezawa - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):645-665.
The Implications of Consistency.Mary Bloodsworth - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3/4):15-20.
Plato: Protagoras.Nicholas Denyer (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Hedonism - Some Aspects and Insights.Kristian Urstad - 2012 - Canadian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
The Hedonist's Dilemma.Dale Dorsey - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):173-196.
Four Educators in Plato's Theaetetus.Avi I. Mintz - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):657-673.
Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues.Catherine Osborne - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.
Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total downloads
41 ( #137,396 of 2,210,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #63,455 of 2,210,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature