Deception in Business Networks: Is It Easier to Lie Online?
Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):537 - 549 (2009)
Abstract
This article synthesizes research presented in several models of unethical behavior to develop propositions about the factors that facilitate and mitigate deception in online business communications. The work expands the social network perspective to incorporate the medium of communication as a significant influence on deception. We go beyond existing models by developing seven propositions that identify how social network and issue moral intensity characteristics influence the probability of deception in online business communication in comparison to traditional communication channels. Remedies to detect and discourage deception in online business networks are also offered, as well as limitations and future research directionsAuthor's Profile
Reprint years
2010
DOI
10.1007/s10551-010-0605-z
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relational Consequences of Perceived Deception in Online Shopping: The Moderating Roles of Type of Product, Consumer’s Attitude Toward the Internet and Consumer’s Demographics. [REVIEW]Sergio Román - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):373 - 391.
Self-deception.Stanley Paluch - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):268-278.
Understanding and explaining real self-deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
Self-deception vs. self-caused deception: A comment on professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Deception and Mutual Trust: A Reply to Strudler.Peter C. Cramton - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):823-832.
The uses of self-deception.Howard Rachlin & Marvin Frankel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):124-125.
Identity, Self-Awareness, and Self-Deception: Ethical Implications for Leaders and Organizations.Cam Caldwell - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S3):393 - 406.
Self-deceived about self-deception: An evolutionary analysis.Mario Heilmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):116-117.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-09-29
Downloads
18 (#614,705)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2013-09-29
Downloads
18 (#614,705)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are Individuals More Willing to Lie to a Computer or a Human? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Setting.Ethan LaMothe & Donna Bobek - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 167 (2):157-180.
The association of moral development and moral intensity with music piracy.Darryl J. Woolley - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (3):211-218.
References found in this work
The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. [REVIEW]Sara A. Morris & Robert A. McDonald - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):715 - 726.
An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct.Joan M. McMahon & Robert J. Harvey - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (4):381-404.