Issues management and ethics
Journal of Business Ethics 7 (3):191 - 198 (1988)
Abstract
Issues management (IM) is becoming widely accepted in the business-and-society literature as a policy tool to enhance the social performance of corporations. Its acceptance is based on the presumption that firms have incorporated ethical norms into their decision-making process. This paper argues that IM is simply a technique to identify, analyze, and respond to social issues. It can be used either to improve or forestall corporate social performance. Different values will steer IM practitioners in different policy directions.If IM is to be more than a social gadget, designed to promote the firm's narrow economic objectives, it must be self-consciously grounded in ethics. Stakeholder analysis and the comprehensive corporate ethic are concepts that can help forge links between ethics and the administrative process, between values and decision-making in IM.My notes
Similar books and articles
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):53-73.
Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development.Jeanne M. Logsdon & Kristi Yuthas - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1213-1226.
Management priorities and management ethics.Justin G. Longenecker - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):65 - 70.
Corporate ethical consulting: Developing management strategies for corporate ethics. [REVIEW]Richard H. Guerrette - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):373 - 380.
The construct validity of the Kinder, lydenberg & domini social performance ratings data.Mark Sharfman - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):287 - 296.
Business ethics and social responsibility in finance instruction: An abdication of responsibility. [REVIEW]Delvin D. Hawley - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):711 - 721.
Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. [REVIEW]Brenda E. Joyner & Dinah Payne - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):297 - 311.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
25 (#465,975)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
25 (#465,975)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reciprocity in Firm–Stakeholder Dialog: Timeliness, Valence, Richness, and Topicality.Lite J. Nartey, Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-23.
The movement for reforming american business ethics: A twenty-year perspective. [REVIEW]Simcha B. Werner - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):61-70.
Managers in the Moral Dimension: What Etzioni Might Mean to Corporate Managers.Bill Shaw & Frances E. Zollers - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):153-168.
Managers in the Moral Dimension: What Etzioni Might Mean to Corporate Managers.Bill Shaw & Frances E. Zollers - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):153-168.
References found in this work
Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do.Manuel G. Velasquez - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1-18.
Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations.John Ladd - 1970 - The Monist 54 (4):488-516.
From CSR1 to CSR2 The Maturing of Business-and-Society Thought.William C. Frederick - 1994 - Business and Society 33 (2):150-164.
Corporate responsibility and corporate personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.