Purpose and Procedure in Philosophy of Perception
Heather Logue & Louise Richardson (eds.)
New York: Oxford University Press (2021)
Abstract
Contemporary philosophy of perception is dominated by extremely polarized debates. The polarization is particularly acute in the debate between naïve realist disjunctivists and their opponents, but divisions seem almost as stark in other areas of dispute (for example, the debate over whether we experience so-called ‘high-level’ properties, and the debate concerning individuation of the senses). The guiding hypothesis underlying this volume is that such polarization stems from insufficient attention to how we should go about settling these debates. In general, there is widespread, largely implicit disagreement concerning what philosophical theories of perception are supposed to explain, the claims that we should hold fixed in the course of theorizing, and the methods that such theorizing should employ. The goal of this volume is to move such methodological questions from the background to the fore, in the hope of facilitating progress. The contributions constitute an initial effort to spur more explicit, systematic discussion of methodology in philosophy of perception. They cover a wide range of relevant topics, from the relation between scientific and philosophical theorizing about perception, to lessons we can learn from the history of philosophy of perception.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
High-Level Perception and Multimodal Perception.Dan Cavedon-Taylor - 2021 - In Heather Logue & Louise Richardson (eds.), Purpose and Procedure in Philosophy of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Are Perceptual Experiences Just Representations?Logue Heather - 2016 - In Bence Nanay (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
Naturalistic Limits of Phenomenology of Perception.Piotr Markiewicz - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (7-8):137-148.
Aristotelian Physics: Teleological Procedure in Aristotle, Thomas, and Buridan.Helen S. Lang - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (3):569 - 591.
Aspiration of the Criminal Procedure – the Truth.Tomas Rudzkis & Artūras Panomariovas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):739-754.
‘A Unique Way of Being’: The Place of Music in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception.Marc Duby - 2019 - In Stuart Grant, Jodie McNeilly-Renaudie & Matthew Wagner (eds.), Performance Phenomenology: To the Thing Itself. Springer Verlag. pp. 111-131.
The Paradigmatic Significance of Perception in Mullā Ṣadrā’s Philosophy of Being.Anthony F. Shaker - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 12 (24):115-143.
The Paradigmatic Significance of Perception in Mullā Ṣadrā's Philosophy of Being.Anthony F. Shaker - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 12 (24):115-143.
ドイツ・日本刑法に関する対話: Deutsch-Japanischer Strafrechtsdialog.Henning Rosenau & Sang-Gyun Kim (eds.) - 2010 - P. Lang.
The Paradigmatic Significance of Perception in Mullā Ṣadrā’s Philosophy of Being.آنتونی ف شاکر - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 12 (24):115-143.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure: Can't live with it, can't live without it.Charles F. Blaich - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):194-195.
Dharmakīrti and His Commentators on the Process of Perceptual Activities.Jeson Woo - 2019 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 47 (1):31-48.
Philosophy of Perception: A road-map with many bypass roads.Bence Nanay - 2016 - In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception. London: Routlegde.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-07-20
Downloads
11 (#845,568)
6 months
6 (#132,607)
2020-07-20
Downloads
11 (#845,568)
6 months
6 (#132,607)
Historical graph of downloads