Film and Philosophy 19:34-53 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
Provides an account of philosophy adopted from Being and Time and later works of Heidegger in order to respond to key questions in the film-as-philosophy debate. I follow the school of Stanley Cavell, Robert Sinnerbrink, and Stephen Mulhall in the view that philosophy occurs in film in phenomenological ways that transcend mere argumentative discourse and logical analysis. Some of the views I counter include those of Bruce Russell and Paisley Livingston.
Keywords Film as Philosophy  Stanley Cavell  Robert Sinnerbrink  Martin Heidegger  Stephen Mulhall  Bruce Russell  Philosophy  Phenomenology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015, 2016
DOI 10.5840/filmphil2015194
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cavell on Film.Stanley Cavell - 2005 - State University of New York Press.
Re-Enfranchising Film: Towards a Romantic Film-Philosophy.”.Robert Sinnerbrink - 2011 - In Havi Carel & Greg Tuck (eds.), New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 25--47.
Reading Cavell.Alice Crary & Sanford Shieh (eds.) - 2005 - Routledge.
Stephen Mulhall (2008) On Film , 2nd Edition.Joshua Shaw - 2009 - Film-Philosophy 13 (1):187-198.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-05

Total views
11 ( #823,330 of 2,445,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,686 of 2,445,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes