Comments on Kenneth P. Winkler’s “Signification, Intention, Projection”

Philosophia 37 (3):503-505 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


These are my comments on Ken Winkler's account of Locke's philosophy of language.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Signification, intention, projection.Kenneth P. Winkler - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):477-501.
Comment on Kenneth Winkler's 'Berkeley and Newton'.David Scarrow - 1985 - Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 10:80-84.
Language, meaning, and mind in Locke's Essay.Michael Losonsky - 2007 - In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's Essay. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 286-312.
Hutcheson's moral realism.David Fate Norton - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (3):397-418.
Teaching & learning guide for: Locke on language.Walter Ott - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):877-879.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2008 - Philosophical Investigations 14 (3):280-288.
Remarks on McCormick’s Comments.Walter Ott - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):475-476.
Language and Meaning.E. J. Lowe - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. pp. 279–295.


Added to PP

10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
81 (#65,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references