Descartes and Malebranche on thought, sensation and the nature of the mind

Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402 (2005)
: Malebranche famously objects to Descartes' argument that the nature of the mind is better known than the nature of body as follows: if we had an idea of the mind's nature we would know the possible range of modes of the mind, including the sensory modes, but we do not know those modes and thus can't have an idea of the mind's nature. I argue that Malebranche's objections are readily answerable from within the Cartesian system. This argument involves examining the status of sensations in Descartes, innate ideas, and Malebranche's occasionalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2005.0164
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,422
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Galen Barry (2015). Cartesian Modes and The Simplicity of Mind. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):54-76.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

103 ( #44,917 of 1,924,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #107,540 of 1,924,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.