Epicureanism and Early Modern Naturalism

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):647 - 664 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is often suggested that certain forms of early modern philosophy are naturalistic. Although I have some sympathy with this description, I argue that applying the category of naturalism to early modern philosophy is not useful. There is another category that does most of the work we want the category of naturalism to do ? one that, unlike naturalism, was actually used by early moderns

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-29

Downloads
984 (#13,266)

6 months
166 (#17,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Was Spinoza a Naturalist?Alexander Douglas - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):77-99.
Early Modern Accounts of Epicureanism.Stewart Duncan & Antonia LoLordo - forthcoming - In Jacob Klein & Nathan Powers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Force (God) in Descartes' physics.Gary C. Hatfield - 1979 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (2):113-140.
1 A summary biography of Hobbes.Noel Malcolm - 1996 - In Tom Sorell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13.

Add more references