Gassendi and Hobbes

In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Knowledge in Modern Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 27-43 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Gassendi and Hobbes knew each other, and their approaches to philosophy often seem similar. They both criticized the Cartesian epistemology of clear and distinct perception. Gassendi engaged at length with skepticism, and also rejected the Aristotelian notion of scientia, arguing instead for a probabilistic view that shows us how we can move on in the absence of certain and evident knowledge. Hobbes, in contrast, retained the notion of scientia, which is the best sort of knowledge and involves causal explanation. He thought, however, that this sort of knowledge was only available in geometry and political philosophy.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gassendi on human knowledge of the mind.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (1):1-21.
Was Gassendi an Epicurean?Monte Ransome Johnson - 2003 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):339 - 360.
Pierre gassendi and the birth of early modern philosophy (review).Lisa T. Sarasohn - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 485-486.
Knowledge of God in Leviathan.Stewart Duncan - 2005 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (1):31-48.
The Activity of Matter in Gassendi's Physics.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2:75-103.
Epicurean and galilean motion in gassendi's physics.Antonia LoLordo - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (2):301–314.
Optics in Hobbes’s Natural Philosophy.Franco Giudice - 2016 - Hobbes Studies 29 (1):86-102.


Added to PP

772 (#21,230)

6 months
152 (#23,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stewart Duncan
University at Buffalo
Antonia LoLordo
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Hobbes on Powers, Accidents, and Motions.Stewart Duncan - 2024 - In Sebastian Bender & Dominik Perler (eds.), Powers and Abilities in Early Modern Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 126–145.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hobbes and Descartes.Richard Tuck - 1988 - In Graham Alan John Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
Hobbes.John Laird - 1935 - Mind 44 (173):75-84.
Hobbes.John Laird - 1934 - Philosophy 9 (35):352-356.
Hobbes.John Laird - 1934 - New York,: Russell & Russell.

View all 6 references / Add more references