Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):135-165 (2011)

Authors
Loren Lomasky
University of Virginia
Abstract
The financial Crunch of 2008 was easily explained by both the left and right–too easily. Each insisted that events thoroughly confirmed its own long-held views and utterly refuted those of the opposed camp. This essay argues that there are indeed new lessons to be drawn from the Crunch, lessons that involve balancing the bounty of the Invisible Hand against perils of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Liberal moral imperatives are traced to variables of Personal Choice and External Cost that are typically in tension with each other and thus generate needs for institutional reconstructions that change according to time and circumstance. Personal bankruptcy protection, limited liability corporations, and intellectual property are cited as examples. It is argued that the Crunch occurred because of failure adequately to balance these variables. Three paradoxes came to a head in 2008: Paradox of Efficient Markets; Paradox of Reduced Risk; Paradox of Hard-won Knowledge. The essay concludes with suggestions concerning specific lessons to be drawn from the Crunch and a corresponding list of lessons not to be drawn.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0265052510000245
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Dominating Effects of Economic Crises.Alexander Bryan - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (6):884-908.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberty After Lehman Brothers: Loren E. Lomasky.Loren E. Lomasky - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):135-165.
The Paradox of Association: Loren E. Lomasky.Loren E. Lomasky - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (2):182-200.
Grelling’s Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
Grelling's Paradox.Noel Burton-Roberts - 2001 - In Robert M. Harrish & Istvan Kenesei (eds.), Philosophical Studies. John Benjamins. pp. 90--187.
How Hard Are the Sceptical Paradoxes?Alex Byrne - 2004 - Noûs 38 (2):299–325.
Liberty.Isaiah Berlin (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Liberty.Matt Zwolinski - 2009 - In John Shand (ed.), Central Issues in Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 275--286.
Liberty.Edited by Henry Hardy (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Lessons of the Liar.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1979 - Theory and Decision 11 (1):55-70.
Paradox.Doris Olin - 2003 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-08-28

Total views
79 ( #149,806 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes