Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163 (2003)
AbstractKant's use of the leading thread of his table of logical forms of judgment to analyze judgments of taste yields more results than Allison's account allows. It reveals in judgments of taste the combination of two judgments: a descriptive judgment about the object, and a normative judgment about the judging subjects. Core arguments of Kant's critique of taste receive new light from this analysis
Similar books and articles
Sensus Communis as a Foundation for Men as Political Beings: Arendt’s Reading of Kant’s Critique of Judgment.Annelies Degryse - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
The Subjective Basis of Kant's Judgment of Taste.Brian Watkins - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (4):315-336.
Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.Henry Allison - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194.
Beauty as a Symbol of Natural Systematicity.Andrew Chignell - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):406-415.
Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste.Luigi Caranti - 2005 - Kant Studien 96 (3):364-374.
Dialogue: Paul Guyer and Henry Allison on Allison's Kant's Theory of Taste.Paul Guyer & Henry E. Allison - 2006 - In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
The Intentionality of Judgments of Taste in Kant's Critique of Judgment.Joseph Cannon - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (1):53–65.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Free Harmony of the Faculties and the Primacy of Imagination in Kant's Aesthetic Judgment.Lara Ostaric - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1376-1410.
Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):433-453.
References found in this work
No references found.