Imprint Academic (2004)

Abstract
Moral relativism is often regarded as both fatally flawed and incompatible with liberalism. This book aims to show why such criticism is misconceived. First, it argues that relativism provides a plausible account of moral justification. Drawing on the contemporary relatavist and universalist analyses of thinkers such as Harman, Nagel and Habermas, it develops an alternative account of coherence relativism.
Keywords Ethical relativism  Liberalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
Call number BJ37.L66 2004
ISBN(s) 1845400046   9781845400040
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Relativism.Christopher Gowans - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaethics.Geoff Sayre-McCord - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):543-551.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
38 ( #298,746 of 2,506,112 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,112 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes