Response to Singer and Kuhse

Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):95 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peter Singer and Helga Kuhse reject my claim that because their views on the mortality of infanticide are metaphysically incommensurate with those of Paul Ramsey they cannot refute his position. According to them, I have failed to see that Ramsey contradicts himself. Once this is seen, no further refutation is needed. I argue that there is no contradiction and offer further thoughts on the metaphysically incommensurate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kuhse, Singer and slippery slopes.G. J. Fairbairn - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):132-147.
Response to Scarlett.P. Singer & H. Kuhse - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):218-218.
More On Euthanasia.Peter Singer & Helsa Kuhse - 1993 - The Monist 76 (2):158-174.
Whose life?H. Kuhse & P. Singer - 1994 - Bioethics 8 (3).
From the editors.Helge Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1998 - Bioethics 12 (3):iii–v.
From the Editors.Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 2004 - Bioethics 13 (3‐4):iii-iv.
Editorial.Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1999 - Bioethics 13 (2):iii-vi.
From the Editors.Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1999 - Bioethics 13 (5):iii-v.
Editorial.Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1999 - Bioethics 13 (1):iii–iv.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
80 (#204,784)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references