Foundations of Science 12 (4):337-366 (2007)
The “DNA is a program” metaphor is still widely used in Molecular Biology and its popularization. There are good historical reasons for the use of such a metaphor or theoretical model. Yet we argue that both the metaphor and the model are essentially inadequate also from the point of view of Physics and Computer Science. Relevant work has already been done, in Biology, criticizing the programming paradigm. We will refer to empirical evidence and theoretical writings in Biology, although our arguments will be mostly based on a comparison with the use of differential methods (in Molecular Biology: a mutation or alike is observed or induced and its phenotypic consequences are observed) as applied in Computer Science and in Physics, where this fundamental tool for empirical investigation originated and acquired a well-justified status. In particular, as we will argue, the programming paradigm is not theoretically sound as a causal(as in Physics) or deductive(as in Programming) framework for relating the genome to the phenotype, in contrast to the physicalist and computational grounds that this paradigm claims to propose.
|Keywords||Genome Programming theory Differential methods in Physics and Biology System Biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination.Gerald M. Edelman & Giulio Tononi - 2000 - Basic Books.
Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word.Walter J. Ong - 1983 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (4):270-271.
Citations of this work BETA
The Validity of Dawkins's Selfish Gene Theory and the Role of the Unconscious in Decision Making.Tobias A. Mattei - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (2):148-149.
Similar books and articles
Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):445-470.
Darwinian Reductionism, or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology.Alexander Rosenberg - 2006 - University of Chicago Press.
Approximations, Idealizations and 'Experiments' at the Physics-Biology Interface.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):145-154.
Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.Joel B. Hagen - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2):321 - 341.
Linus Pauling : Molecular Disease and the Oorigins [Sic] of Molecular Biology.Francisco Javier Serrano Bosquet - 2009 - In González Recio & José Luis (eds.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology. G. Olms.
Models of and Models For: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Biology.Evelyn Fox Keller - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):86.
Theory Structure and Theory Change in Contemporary Molecular Biology.Sylvia Culp & Philip Kitcher - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):459-483.
Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the 'Central Dogma' of Molecular Biology.Predrag Šustar - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the ‘Central Dogma’ of Molecular Biology.Predrag Sustar - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #151,117 of 2,168,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,283 of 2,168,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?