Nobody Needs a Theory of Art

Journal of Philosophy 105 (3):109-127 (2008)

Authors
Dominic McIver Lopes
University of British Columbia
Abstract
The question "what is art?" is often said to be venerable and vexing. In fact, the following answer to the question should be obvious: (R) item x is a work of art if and only if x is a work in practice P and P is one of the arts. Yet (R) has appeared so far from obvious that nobody has given it a moment's thought. The trouble is not that anyone might seriously deny the truth of (R), but rather that they will find it uninformative. After all, the vexing question is pressed upon us by radical changes in art of the avant-garde, and (R) offers no resources to address these changes. With that in mind, here is the case for (R). The challenges posed by the avant-garde are real enough and they need to be addressed, but the vexing question is the wrong question to ask to address them. It does not follow that the question has no good answer. On the contrary, (R) is all the answer we need, if we do not need an answer that addresses the challenges posed by the avant-garde. Moreover, (R) points to a question that we do need answered. So, not only is it true but, in addition, (R) is as informative as we need.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0022-362X
DOI 10.5840/jphil200810531
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Defining Art and its Future.Zachary Isrow - 2017 - Journal of Arts and Humanities 6 (6):84-94.
In Advance of the Broken Theory: Philosophy and Contemporary Art.Sherri Irvin & Julian Dodd - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):375-386.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtues of Art: Good Taste.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):197-211.
Beyond Art.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Painting.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2001 - In Berys Nigel Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Routledge.
From Languages of Art to Art in Mind.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (3):227-231.
Out of Sight, Out of Mind.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2003 - In Matthew Kieran & Dominic McIver Lopes (eds.), Imagination, Philosophy, and the Arts.
The Ontology of Interactive Art.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2001 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 35 (4):65-81.
Introduction.Costello Diarmuid & Lopes Dominic Mciver - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):1-8.
Introduction.Dominic Mciver Lopes Diarmuid Costello - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):1-8.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
341 ( #16,379 of 2,265,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #183,697 of 2,265,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature