Spontaneity and Materiality: What Photography Is in the Photography of James Welling

Art History 42 (1):154-76 (2019)

Abstract

Images are double agents. They receive information from the world, while also projecting visual imagination onto the world. As a result, mind and world tug our thinking about images, or particular kinds of images, in contrary directions. On one common division, world traces itself mechanically in photographs, whereas mind expresses itself through painting.1 Scholars of photography disavow such crude distinctions: much recent writing attends in detail to the materials and processes of photography, the agency of photographic artists, and the social determinants of the production and reception of photographs. As such writing makes plain, photographs cannot be reduced to mechanical traces.2 Yet background conceptions of photography as trace or index persist almost by default, as no framework of comparable explanatory power has yet emerged to replace them. A conception of photography adequate to developments in recent scholarship is long overdue. Rather than constructing such a conception top-down, as philosophers are wont to do, this paper articulates it by examining selected works by James Welling.3 There are several reasons for this: Welling’s practice persistently explores the resources and possibilities of photography, the effect of these explorations is to express a particular metaphysics of the mind’s relation to its world, and appreciating why this metaphysics is aptly expressed by exploring photography requires a revised conception of what photography is. In as much as it provides a framework for a richer interpretation of Welling, the new conception is also capable of underwriting a wide range of critical and historical approaches to photography.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-07

Downloads
442 (#22,647)

6 months
46 (#17,824)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Dominic McIver Lopes
University of British Columbia
Diarmuid Costello
University of Warwick

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Abstraction in Photography?Diarmuid Costello - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (4):385-400.
Depictive Traces: On the Phenomenology of Photography.Mikael Pettersson - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):185-196.
Transforming Images: How Photography Complicates the Picture.Barbara E. Savedoff - 2001 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (4):427-428.
Talbot's Technologies: Photographic Depiction, Detection, and Reproduction.Patrick Maynard - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (3):263-276.