Epistemic Reasons, Evidence, and Defeaters

In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)

Authors
Errol Lord
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
The post-Gettier literature contained many views that tried to solve the Gettier problem by appealing to the notion of defeat. Unfortunately, all of these views are false. The failure of these views greatly contributed to a general distrust of reasons in epistemology. However, reasons are making a comeback in epistemology, both in general and in the context of the Gettier problem. There are two main aims of this paper. First, I will argue against a natural defeat based resolution of the Gettier problem. Second, I will defend my own defeat based solution. This solution appeals to a modal anti-luck condition. I will argue that this condition captures anti-luck intuitions and has virtues that rival modal anti-luck conditions lack.
Keywords Gettier Problem  Modal Condition on Knowledge  Safety
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,365
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-18

Total views
483 ( #9,431 of 2,271,745 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #92,808 of 2,271,745 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature