Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):569-590 (2016)

Authors
Errol Lord
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
It’s an undeniable fact about our moral lives that we are partial towards certain people and projects. Despite this, it has traditionally been very hard to justify partiality. In this paper I defend a novel partialist theory. The context of the paper is the debate between three different views of how partiality is justified. According to the first view, partiality is justified by facts about our ground projects. According to the second view, partiality is justified by facts about our relationships with the things that we are partial towards. And according to the third view, partiality is justified by facts about the things that we are partial towards. I argue that all three views contain part of the truth. We can see this by adopting a more sophisticated view of the weight of reasons. Once we do this, it will be clear that both facts about individuals and facts about relationships play a role in explaining why we often have stronger reason to act well towards those things we are partial towards. Further, I argue, facts about projects help explain why facts about relationships play the role that they do in determining the strength of our reasons.
Keywords Partiality  Reasons and modifiers  Relationships view  Projects view  Individuals view
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-015-9675-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Slaves of the Passions.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Internal and External Reasons.Bernard Williams - 1979 - In Ross Harrison (ed.), Rational Action. Cambridge University Press. pp. 101-113.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Valuing Anger.Antti Kauppinen - 2018 - In Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Anger. Rowman & Littlefield.
Impartiality.Troy Jollimore - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Relationships as Reasons.Nicholas Gabriel Kolodny - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Partiality, Agent-Relative Reasons, and the Individuals View.Jörg Löschke - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (4):673-682.
Partiality and World Poverty.Christopher Goodmacher - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Reasons as Explanations.John Brunero - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):805-824.
Friendship Without Partiality?Troy Jollimore - 2000 - Ratio 13 (1):69–82.
Hume's and Smith's Partial Sympathies and Impartial Stances.Jon Rick - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):135-158.
Personal Projects and Reasons for Partiality.Monika Betzler - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (4):683-692.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-11-29

Total views
251 ( #38,471 of 2,448,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,054 of 2,448,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes