In Sebastian Schmidt & Gerhard Ernst (eds.), The Ethics of Belief and Beyond. Understanding Mental Normativity. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 126-145 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Errol Lord explores the boundaries of epistemic normativity. He argues that we
can understand these better by thinking about which mental states are
competitors in rationality’s competition. He argues that belief, disbelief,
and two kinds of suspension of judgment are competitors. Lord shows
that there are non-evidential reasons for suspension of judgment. One
upshot is an independent motivation for a certain sort of pragmatist view
of epistemic rationality.
|
| Keywords | Suspension of Judgment Reasons for Belief Pragmatism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
View all 16 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Credences and Suspended Judgments as Transitional Attitudes.Julia Staffel - 2019 - Philosophical Issues 29 (1):281-294.
Transitional Attitudes and the Unmooring View of Higher-Order Evidence.Julia Staffel - forthcoming - Noûs.
Similar books and articles
De Praktische En Epistemische Waarde van Het Pyrronisme.Diego Machuca - 2016 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 108 (1):73-98.
Suspension, Equipollence, and Inquiry: A Reply to Wieland.Diego E. Machuca - 2015 - Analytic Philosophy 56 (2):177-187.
Suspension-to-Suspension Justification Principles.Peter Murphy - forthcoming - Belgrade Philosophical Annual.
The Weight of Facts: A Puzzle About Perception, Reasons and Deliberation.Andrea Giananti - 2019 - Ratio 32 (2):104-113.
Does Pyrrhonism Have Practical or Epistemic Value?Diego E. Machuca - 2019 - In Giuseppe Veltri, Racheli Haliva, Stephan Franz Schmid & Emidio Spinelli (eds.), Sceptical Paths: Enquiry and Doubt from Antiquity to the Present. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 43-66.
The Suspension of Judgment or the Conquest of the Phenomenon-Reflections on a Possible Comparison Between the Suspension of Judgment of Husserl and of the Greek Sceptics.T. Pentzopoulouvalalas - 1988 - Kant-Studien 79 (2):218-235.
The Ethics of Belief and Beyond: Understanding Mental Normativity.Sebastian Schmidt & Gerhard Ernst - 2020 - Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Rational Agnosticism and Degrees of Belief.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4:57.
Moderate Epistemic Akrasia.Nicolás Lo Guercio - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (148):69-97.
Religious Disagreements and Epistemic Rationality.David M. Holley - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):33-48.
Discussion Note: Selim Berker’s Combinatorial Argument Against Practical Reasons for Belief.Adam Shmidt - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):763-776.
When Evidence Isn't Enough: Suspension, Evidentialism, and Knowledge-First Virtue Epistemology.Lisa Miracchi - 2019 - Episteme 16 (4):413-437.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-04
Total views
239 ( #43,018 of 2,461,943 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #11,497 of 2,461,943 )
2020-06-04
Total views
239 ( #43,018 of 2,461,943 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #11,497 of 2,461,943 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
