The Virtual and the Ether: Transcendental Empiricism in Kant's Opus Postumum

Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 39 (2):147-166 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00071773.2008.11006639

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,191

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Apperception and Ether: On the Idea of a Transcendental Deduction of Matter in Kant's Opus postumum.Burkhard Tuschling - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 191-216.
The transition within the transition: the Übergang from the Selbstsetzungslehre to the ether proofs in Kant’s Opus postumum.Stephen Howard - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (4):595-617.
The Role of the Organism in the Transcendental Philosophy of Kant’s Opus postumum.Ernst-Otto Onnasch - 2014 - In Eric Watkins & Ina Goy, Kant's Theory of Biology. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 239-256.
Kant's Conception of Ether as a Field in the Opus postumum.Wing-Chun Wong - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:405-411.
Kant's Selbstsetzungslehre.Eckart Forster - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 217-238.
""The New" Transcendental Aesthetics" in Kant's" Opus Postumum".Leopoldo Prieto Lopez - 2009 - Pensamiento 65 (243):79-116.
Psychology and the Transcendental Deduction.Paul Guyer - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 47-68.
Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Judgment?Rolf-Peter Horstmann - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 157-176.
Notes.[author unknown] - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 249-268.
Kant's "Dynamics": Comments on Tuschling and Forster.Jules Vuillemin - 1988 - In Eckart Förster, Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford University Press. pp. 239-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
27 (#955,945)

6 months
3 (#1,292,044)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Beth Lord
University of Aberdeen

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2008.Margit Ruffing - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (4):487-538.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references