Authors
Pablo Lorenzano
Freie Universität Berlin (PhD)
Abstract
The question posed by the title is usually answered by saying that the “synthesis” between the theory of evolution by natural selection and classical genetics, which took place in 1930s-40s, would have taken place much earlier if Darwin had been aware of Mendel and his work. What is more, it nearly happened: it would have been enough if Darwin had cut the pages of the offprint of Mendel’s work that was in his library and read them! Or, if Mendel had come across Darwin in London or paid him a visit at his house in the outskirts! (on occasion of Mendel’s trip in 1862 to that city). The aim of the present paper is to provide elements for quite a different answer, based on further historical evidence, especially on Mendel’s works, some of which mention Darwins’s studies.
Keywords Darwin  Mendel  hybridism  speciation  evolution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper.Floyd V. Monaghan & Alain F. Corcos - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):267-292.
Mendel and Darwin a New Link in the Old Quarrel.Jan Wilczyński - 1943 - Acta Biotheoretica 7 (1-2):81-88.
Gemmules and Elements: On Darwin’s and Mendel’s Concepts and Methods in Heredity. [REVIEW]Ute Deichmann - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):85-112.
A Conceptual Ambiguity That Contributed to the Neglect of Mendel's Paper.Iris Sandler & Laurence Sandler - 1985 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7 (1):3 - 70.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-04

Total views
20 ( #494,735 of 2,349,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes