Synthese:1-18 (forthcoming)

Authors
Roberto Loss
Complutense University of Madrid
Abstract
According to ‘Strong Composition as Identity’, if an entity is composed of a plurality of entities, it is identical to them. As it has been argued in the literature, SCAI appears to give rise to some serious problems which seem to suggest that SCAI-theorists should take their plural quantifier to be governed by some ‘weak’ plural comprehension principle and, thus, ‘exclude’ some kinds of pluralities from their plural ontology. The aim of this paper is to argue that, contrary to what may appear at first sight, the assumption of a weak plural comprehension principle is perfectly compatible with plural logic and the common uses of plural quantification. As I aim to show, SCAI-theorists can simply claim that their theory must be understood as formulated by means of the most ‘joint-carving’ plural quantifier, thus leaving open the possibility of other, less joint-carving, ‘unrestricted’ plural quantifiers. In the final part of the paper I will also suggest that SCAI-theorists should not only allow for singular quantification over pluralities of entities, but also for plural quantification over ‘super-pluralities’ of entities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-020-02628-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Monism: The Priority of the Whole.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):31-76.
Against Parthood.Theodore Sider - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:237–293.
Plural Logic.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2013 - Oxford University Press UK.
Plural Predication.Thomas McKay - 2006 - Oxford University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Composition as Identity and the Innocence of Mereology.Roberto Loss - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is There a Plural Object?Byeong-Uk Yi - forthcoming - In Donal Baxter & Aaron Cotnoir (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press.
Consequences of Collapse.Theodore Sider - 2014 - In Donald Baxter & Aaron Cotnoir (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press. pp. 211-221.
Plural Quantification Exposed.Øystein Linnebo - 2003 - Noûs 37 (1):71–92.
We Are Not a Plural Subject.Ludger Jansen - 2018 - ProtoSociology 35:167-196.
Plural Quantification.Ø Linnebo - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Composition and Identities.Manuel Lechthaler - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Otago
On Atomic Composition as Identity.Roberto Loss - forthcoming - Synthese:1-24.
On the Ontological Commitment of Mereology.Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):164-174.
Composition as a Kind of Identity.Phillip Bricker - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):264-294.
Relations as Plural-Predications in Plato.Theodore Scaltsas - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):28-49.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-27

Total views
57 ( #181,986 of 2,438,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #18,325 of 2,438,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes