Expected utility and constrained maximization: Problems of compatibility [Book Review]

Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48 (1994)
Abstract
In recent attempts at deriving morality from rationality expected utility theory has played a major role. In the most prominent such attempt, Gauthier'sMorals by Agreement, a mode of maximizing utility calledconstrained maximization is defended. I want to show that constrained maximization or any similar proposal cannot be coherently supported by expected utility theory. First, I point to an important implication of that theory. Second, I discuss the question of what the place of constrained maximization in utility theory might be. Third, I argue that no matter how we answer this question, expected utility theory cannot provide the reason why a moral disposition like constrained maximization is to be preferred to its rivals.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01128909
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,894
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The Possibility of Cooperation.Michael Taylor - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
70 ( #81,209 of 2,211,402 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,708 of 2,211,402 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature