- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Citation-based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument
Argumentation 19 (3):259-266 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1007/s10503-005-4415-x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Translating Toulmin Diagrams: Theory Neutrality in Argument Representation.Chris Reed & Glenn Rowe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):267-286.
Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems.James F. Voss - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):321-329.
Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach. [REVIEW]Lev G. Vassiliev - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):21-34.
The Dependence of Stephen Toulmin’s Epistemology on a Description/Prescription Dichotomy.Harold H. Kuester - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:521-530.
Respondeo: Method and content in casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
On the processing of arguments.James F. Voss, Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer, Jennifer Wiley & Laurie Ney Silfies - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (2):165-181.
(Not) giving credit where credit is due: Citation of data sets.Joan E. Sieber & Bruce E. Trumbo - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):11-20.
An argument against an argument against the necessity of universal mereological composition.Duncan Watson - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):78-82.
Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended from Biology to Epistemology?Carla E. Kary - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s Layout of Arguments.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):255-258.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-21
Downloads
15 (#734,130)
6 months
1 (#494,451)
2013-11-21
Downloads
15 (#734,130)
6 months
1 (#494,451)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Using Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking in a First-Year Writing Course.Maralee Harrell & Danielle Wetzel - 2015 - In Ron Barnett & Bob Ennis Martin Davies (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. New York, NY, USA: pp. 213-232.
Challenges and Remedies for Identifying and Classifying Argumentation Schemes.Robert Anthony & Mijung Kim - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):81-113.
David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6968689d5f-brlq2 N