Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):660-660 (2008)
The proposal of Rips et al. is motivated by discontinuity and input claims. The discontinuity claim is that no continuity exists between early (nonverbal) numerical representations and natural number. The input claim is that particular experiences (e.g., cardinality-related talk and object-based activities) do not aid in natural number construction. We discuss reasons to doubt both claims in their strongest forms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
One, Two, Three, Four, Nothing More: An Investigation of the Conceptual Sources of the Verbal Counting Principles.Mathieu Le Corre & Susan Carey - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):395-438.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Numerical Computations and Mathematical Modelling with Infinite and Infinitesimal Numbers.Yaroslav Sergeyev - 2009 - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 29:177-195.
What Numbers Are Real?Kenneth L. Manders - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:253 - 269.
Core Systems of Number.Stanislas Dehaene, Elizabeth Spelke & Lisa Feigenson - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7):307-314.
Language and Number: A Bilingual Training Study.Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2001 - Cognition 78 (1):45-88.
All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations.Daniel C. Hyde & Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #357,550 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?