Formal and material theories in philosophy of science: a methodological interpretation

In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 175--185 (2010)
John Norton’s argument that all formal theories of induction fail raises substantive questions about the philosophical analysis of scientific reasoning. What are the criteria of adequacy for philosophical theories of induction, explanation, or theory structure? Is more than one adequate theory possible? Using a generalized version of Norton’s argument, I demonstrate that the competition between formal and material theories in philosophy of science results from adhering to different criteria of adequacy. This situation encourages an interpretation of “formal” and “material” as indicators of divergent criteria that accompany different philosophical methodologies. I characterize another criterion of adequacy associated with material theories, the avoidance of imported problems, and conclude that one way to negotiate between conflicting criteria is to adopt a pluralist stance toward philosophical theories of scientific reasoning
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Re-Orienting Discussions of Scientific Explanation: A Functional Perspective.Andrea I. Woody - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:79-87.
Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles, and Scientific Explaining in Practice.Alan C. Love - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:88-94.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Miraculous Choice Argument for Realism.E. C. Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (2):97 - 120.
The Identification of Ethical Principles.James F. Childress - 1977 - Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (1):39 - 66.
On Quantitative Relationist Theories.Brent Mundy - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):582-600.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
A Material Theory of Induction.John D. Norton - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Theories and Theories of Truth.Ryan Christensen - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Scientific Reasoning Is Material Inference: Combining Confirmation, Discovery, and Explanation.Ingo Brigandt - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):31-43.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
39 ( #146,414 of 2,214,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #173,487 of 2,214,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature