On guinea pigs, dogs and men: Anaphylaxis and the study of biological individuality, 1902-1939

Abstract
In 1910, Charles Richet suggested that studying individual variations in anaphylactic responses might both open a way to experimental investigation of the biological basis of individuality and help unify the immunological and physiological approaches to biological phenomena. The very opposite would happen however. In the next two decades, physiologists and immunologists interested in anaphylaxis and allergy experienced more and more difficulties in communicating. This divergence between the physiopathological and immunological approaches derived from discrepancies between the experimental systems used by each of these scientific communities. Trying to develop a point of view that took into account all bodily reactions to stimuli, physiologists thought that individual variations between the laboratory animals they used (mainly dogs and cats) constituted important experimental data. Seeking to develop reproducible studies of infection, immunity and 'sensitisation', bacteriologists and immunologists considered that individual variations between the laboratory animals they used (mainly small rodents) constituted 'noise' and not a 'signal'. Each group's loyalty to the experimental models used in their discipline widened the gap between immunological and physiological explanations of allergies and led to the abandonment of studies on the biological basis of individuality.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1369-8486(03)00053-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Immunity and its Other: The Anaphylactic Selves of Charles Richet.K. Kroker - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 30 (3):273-296.
Qu'est-ce que la physiologie générale?Charles Richet - 1891 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 31:337 - 367.
Pavlov's Physiology Factory.Daniel Todes - 1997 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 88:205-246.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Biotherapies of Chronic Diseases in the Inter-War Period: From Witte's Peptone to Penicillium Extract.Ilana Löwy - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (4):675-695.
Imagining 'Reactivity': Allergy Within the History of Immunology.Michelle Jamieson - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 41 (4):356-366.
Imagining ‘Reactivity’: Allergy Within the History of Immunology.Michelle Jamieson - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (4):356-366.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
25 ( #206,357 of 2,180,039 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #106,355 of 2,180,039 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums