Pure Time Preference: Reply to Johansson and Rosenqvist

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):442-445 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Johansson and Rosenqvist reject our argument for the rational permissibility of pure time preferences (PTP). Johansson and Rosenqvist's main objection is that where two options, X and Y, have equal intrinsic value, there will be a reason to be indifferent between X and Y, and therefore a reason to not hold a PTP for X or Y. In this reply, we argue that if two options have equal intrinsic value, it does not follow that you have a reason to be indifferent. Rather, the two equally large intrinsic values cancel each other out, like two equal weights on kitchen scales.

Other Versions

reprint Lowry, Rosemary; Peterson, Martin (2017) "Pure Time Preference: Reply to Johansson and Rosenqvist". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98(1):442-445

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,203

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Pure Time Preference’: Reply to Lowry and Peterson.Jens Johansson & Simon Rosenqvist - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):435-441.
Do wildernesses have rights?Scott Lehmann - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):129-146.
Toward a Demystification of Egalitarianism.Yingying Tang & Lei Zhong - 2013 - Philosophical Forum 44 (2):149-163.
Incommensurability.Joseph Raz - 1986 - In The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
How Valuable Could a Person Be?Joshua Rasmussen & Andrew M. Bailey - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):264-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-07

Downloads
14 (#1,163,387)

6 months
8 (#800,244)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rosemary Lowry
University of Adelaide (PhD)
Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pure time preference.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
Practical Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1999 - In Reasoning, meaning, and mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
‘Pure Time Preference’: Reply to Lowry and Peterson.Jens Johansson & Simon Rosenqvist - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):435-441.
Pure Time Preference.Martin Peterson Rosemary Lowry - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.

Add more references