Classical Quarterly 38 (01):193- (1988)

Abstract
In the six remarkable elegidia transmitted in the Tibullan corpus as 3.13–18 we appear to possess the writings of an educated Roman woman of aristocratic family and high literary connections: a woman, moreover, who participates as an equal in one of the most distinguished artistic salons of the age, and composes poetry in an obstinately male genre on the subject of her own erotic experience, displaying a candour and the exercise of a sexual independence startingly at odds with the ideology of her class. Such a figure is either, depending on one's viewpoint, too good to be true or too embarrassing to be tolerated. The case could easily be put that Sulpicia, more perhaps even than Sappho, has found her poems condemned by accident of gender to a century and a half of condescension, disregard, and wilful misconstruction to accommodate the inelastic sexual politics of elderly male philologists. Certainly even the most sympathetic of recent comment is prone to lapse into a form of critical language outlawed in Catullan scholarship thirty years ago. Yet feminist critics have been strangely cautious in their response. A scholar who rose swiftly to the defence of Erinna when that elusive poet's identity was impugned has notoriously written of Sulpicia: ‘She was not a brilliant artist: her poems are of interest only because the author is female.’ Five years late, Sulpicia has found a place in the major sourcebook on ancient women, but with the cycle of poems violently reordered after the judgment of a nineteenth-century critic, anxious to restore his poetess's chastity against the disconcerting frankness of the texts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838800031402
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,943
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cerinthus' Pia Cura.J. C. Yardley - 1990 - Classical Quarterly 40 (2):568-570.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sulpicia, Satire 58–61.C. J. Hemer - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (01):12-13.
Sulpicia: Just Another Roman Poet.Carol U. Merriam - 2006 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (1):11-15.
Critical Trends in Interpreting Sulpicia.Alison Keith - 2006 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (1):3-10.
Erasing Cerinthus: Sulpicia and Her Audience.Lee T. Pearcy - 2006 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (1):31-36.
Syntax, or, the Embryogenesis of Meaning.Paul J. M. Jorion - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1027-1028.
Narrow Content Meets Fat Syntax.Stephen P. Stich - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Sulpicia and Her Fama: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering Her Latin Literary Image.Judith P. Hallett - 2006 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (1):37-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
8 ( #956,652 of 2,426,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,589 of 2,426,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes