Heraclitus B 32 revisted in the light of the "Deveni Papyrus"

The objective of this article is to consider whether the Commentator of the Derveni Papyrus can contribute to our understanding of the double divine will to reject and accept the name of Zeus. After examining some inconsistencies that the traditional readings raise, the authoress appeals to the Derveni Papyrus in order to offer an alternative diachronic interpretation. On this reading, the unique wise one, in the first place, does not wish to be called by the name of Zeus because this name ascribes birth and diversification to it, while it is, as such, eternal and simple. On the other hand, as it cyclically becomes multiple, it is also willing to be identified with Zeus, the God who, according to the Papyrus, swallowed his Grandfather�s phallus along with Mind, got pregnant of everything and re-created the universe. This account fits with Heraclitus� doctrine that there is no creation of the world but some kind of derivation of it from the one, and vice-versa
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Concept of the Human Body in Heraclitus.Shawn Loht - forthcoming - Proceedings of the Southeast Philosophy Congress.
De nooit ondergaande zon.Th C. W. Oudemans - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (3):424 - 456.
Heraclitus on Religion.Mantas Adomenas - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (2):87-113.
The Divine Logos: Plato, Heraclitus, and Heidegger in the Sophist.Ammon Allred - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):1-18.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,245,217 of 2,448,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #444,630 of 2,448,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes