Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):287-291 (2006)

Laura Purdy
Wells College
Reproductive autonomy is central to women’s welfare both because childbearing takes place in women’s bodies and because they are generally expected to take primary responsibility for child rearing. In 2005, the factors that influence their autonomy most strongly are poverty and belief systems that devalue such autonomy. Unfortunately, such autonomy is a low priority for most societies, or is anathema to their belief systems altogether. This situation is doubly sad because women’s reproductive autonomy is intrinsically valuable for women and also instrumentally valuable for the welfare of humankind. This paper takes for granted the moral and practical necessity of such autonomy and digs deeper into the question of what such a commitment might entail, focusing on the mid-level policy making that, at least in the US and Canada, plays a significant role in shaping women’s options. This paper examines a large teaching hospital’s policy on reduction of multifetal pregnancies. The policy permits reduction of triplets to twins, but not twins to a singleton. As there is no morally relevant difference between these two types of reduction, it is evident that inappropriate medicalisation can still limit women’s autonomy in undesirable ways
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2004.013193
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Feminism Can Do for Bioethics.Laura M. Purdy - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (2):117-132.
A Feminist View of Health.Laura Purdy - 1996 - In Susan Wolf (ed.), Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Future of Reproductive Autonomy.Josephine Johnston & Rachel L. Zacharias - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):S6-S11.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Women’s Autonomy and Feminist Aspirations.Marilyn Friedman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:331-340.
Autonomy, Gender, Politics.Marilyn Friedman - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
What Can Progress in Reproductive Technology Mean for Women?L. M. Purdy - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5):499-514.
No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male LARCs.Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):22-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #476,727 of 2,455,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes