Responding Appropriately to the Impersonal Good

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):701-714 (2019)

Authors
Jörg Löschke
University of Zürich
Abstract
A promising strategy to make progress in the debate between consequentialist and non-consequentialist moral theories is to unravel the background assumptions of the respective views and discuss their plausibility. This paper discusses a background assumption of consequentialism that has not been noticed so far. Consequentialists claim that morality is about maximizing the impersonal good, and the background assumption is that an appropriate response to the impersonal good is necessarily a response to the impersonal good as a whole. In this paper, I argue that we should understand the impersonal good as a complex good, and that an appropriate responses to a complex good need not be a response to that good as whole. This constitutes a novel objection against consequentialism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-019-10020-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,902
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
The view from nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (2):221-222.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1962 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 30 (4):401-401.
Why Consequentialism’s "Compelling Idea" Is Not.Paul Hurley - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (1):29-54.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ignoring the Good and Deontological Rationality.Natalie Hormaz Vania - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
Friendship Without Partiality?Troy Jollimore - 2000 - Ratio 13 (1):69–82.
Reflection and Morality.Charles Larmore - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):1-28.
A Refutation of Consequentialism.Robert Guay - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):348-362.
Pessimism.George W. Harris - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):271-286.
The Right in the Good: A Defense of Teleological Non-Consequentialism in Epistemology.Clayton Littlejohn - forthcoming - In Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij Jeff Dunn (ed.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.
Good and Bad Actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
On Some Ways in Which A Thing Can Be Good.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-18

Total views
30 ( #317,365 of 2,309,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #42,638 of 2,309,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature