In Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg (eds.), The Lockean Mind. pp. 277-89 (2021)

Authors
Huaping Lu-Adler
Georgetown University
Abstract
This chapter brings some much-needed conceptual clarity to the debate about Locke’s scientific methodology. Instead of having to choose between the method of hypothesis and that of natural history (as most interpreters have thought), he would resist prescribing a single method for natural sciences in general. Following Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle, Locke separates medicine and natural philosophy (physics), so that they call for completely different methods. While a natural philosopher relies on “speculative” (causal-theoretical) hypotheses together with natural-history making to explicate phenomena, a medical practitioner must prioritize collecting data about what remedies tend to cure what diseases over hypothesizing about the causes of the latter.
Keywords John Locke  scientific methodology  hypothesis  natural history  natural philosophy  medicine  Francis Bacon  Robert Boyle  Rene Descarte
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

John Locke and Natural Philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
The Works of John Locke.John Locke - 1727 - Printed for T. Tegg, W. Sharpe and Son [Etc.].
Peach Trees, Gravity and God: Mechanism in Locke.Marleen Rozemond & Gideon Yaffe - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (3):387 – 412.
The Way of Hypothesis: Locke on Method.James Farr - 1987 - Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1):51.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locke, Bacon and Natural History.Peter R. Anstey - 2002 - Early Science and Medicine 7 (1):65-92.
Robert Boyle's 'Designe About Natural History'.Peter Anstey & Michael Hunter - 2008 - Early Science and Medicine 13 (2):83-126.
Boyle, Classification and the Workmanship of the Understanding Thesis.Jan-Erik Jones - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Francis Bacon and the Classification of Natural History.Peter Anstey - 2012 - Early Science and Medicine 17 (1):11-31.
Locke Vs. Boyle: The Real Essence of Corpuscular Species.Jan-Erik Jones - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):659 – 684.
John Locke and Natural Philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Locke and the Methodology of Newton’s Principia.Patrick J. Connolly - 2018 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100 (3):311-335.
Locke, Science and Politics.Steven Forde - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Locke's Philosophy of Science.Hylarie Kochiras - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hedonism and Natural Law in Locke's Moral Philosophy.Elliot Rossiter - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):203-225.
Locke, Natural Law and God -- Again.Francis Oakley - 1997 - History of Political Thought 18 (4):624-651.
Locke's Theory of Classification.Judith Crane - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):249 – 259.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-09

Total views
35 ( #308,895 of 2,448,611 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #19,449 of 2,448,611 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes