A defense of the feminist-vegetarian connection

Hypatia 20 (1):150-177 (2005)
Abstract
: Kathryn Paxton George's recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman? (2000), is the culmination of more than a decade's work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This paper demonstrates that George's key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the debate. Those who do not accept the feminist-vegetarian connection should rethink their position or offer a non-question-begging defense of it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hyp.2005.0015
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1990 - Avon Books.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Care Ethics and Animal Welfare.Daniel Engster - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (4):521–536.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
41 ( #129,814 of 2,191,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,020 of 2,191,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature