Hypatia 20 (1):150-177 (2005)
: Kathryn Paxton George's recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman? (2000), is the culmination of more than a decade's work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This paper demonstrates that George's key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the debate. Those who do not accept the feminist-vegetarian connection should rethink their position or offer a non-question-begging defense of it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory.Marilyn Frye - 1983 - The Crossing Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System.Lisa Weasel - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory.Deborah Slicer - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (4):365-369.
Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little?Nathan Nobis - 2002 - Social Theory and Practice 28 (1):135-156.
Liberal Feminism, From Law to Art: The Impact of Feminist Jurisprudence on Feminist Aesthetics.L. Ryan Musgrave - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (4):214-235.
So Animal a Human ..., Or the Moral Relevance of Being an Omnivore.Kathryn Paxton George - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):172-186.
Transformations: Recollective Imagination and Sexual Difference.Drucilla Cornell - 1993 - Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #128,559 of 2,164,583 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,391 of 2,164,583 )
How can I increase my downloads?