Philosophy 52 (201):255-280 (1977)

Abstract
Equality in the present age has become an idol, in much the same way as property was in the age of Locke. Many people worship it, and think that it provides the key to the proper understanding of politics, and that on it alone can a genuinely just society be reconstructed. This is a mistake. Although, like property, it is a useful concept, and although, like property, there are occasions when we want to have it in practice, it is not a fundamental concept any more than property is, nor can having it vouchsafe to us the good life. In an earlier paper I argued against equality by showing that the concept of equality was confused and that many of the arguments i egalitarians adduced were either invalid or else supported conclusions I which were not really egalitarian at all. Many egalitarians, however, have complained that my arguments were not fair, because I had failed to elucidate the concept adequately, or because the position I attacked was not one that any egalitarian really wished to maintain, or because I had overlooked other arguments which were effective in establishing egalitarian conclusions, or because the positive counter-arguments of my own I put forward more as a matter of taste than of serious political commitment. In this paper, therefore, I want to elucidate the concept more fully, concede what I should to my critics, point out that, even so, their conclusions do not follow, and give further reasons not only for supposing that egalitarian arguments are invalid but for discerning positive merits in some forms of inequality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S003181910002711X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Priority and Position.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):341-360.
The Inegalitarian Ethos: Incentives, Respect, and Self-Respect.Emily McTernan - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):93-111.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equality and Distributive Justice.Norman E. Bowie - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):140 - 148.
Equality: A Plethora of Theories.Louis P. Pojman - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:193-245.
Foundations of Egalitarian Justice.Timothy John Hinton - 1996 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Describing Equality.Carl Knight - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (4):327 - 365.
Justice Beyond Equality.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):315-340.
Equality and Morality.Edo Pivčević - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):75-92.
The Value of Equality.Bertil Tungodden - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):1-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
33 ( #331,252 of 2,454,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,749 of 2,454,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes