Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):225- (1956)

Abstract
In his monumental edition of Callimachus, R. Pfeiffer has questioned the authenticity of three epigrams. More than fifty years ago U. v. Wilamowitz- Moellendorff had rejected Ep. 33 and Ep. 36 4; but Pfeiffer seems to be the first critic to exclude Ep. 63 from the collection of Callimachus' epigrams. Although he sets forth his objections in a long footnote, none of the reviewers has so far discussed this point
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800020218
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,719
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Callimachus, Aetia Fr. 1.9–12.A. S. Hollis - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (02):402-.
Emendations to Callimachus.G. Giangrande - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (02):212-.
Two Hymns of Callimachus.M. L. West - 1986 - The Classical Review 36 (01):27-.
The Roman Callimachus.A. A. R. Henderson - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (01):27-.
Two Notes on Callimachus.A. S. Hollis - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (01):5-.
Callimachus, Hymn Vi. 88.K. J. McKay - 1960 - The Classical Review 10 (02):102-103.
Callimachus, Iambus i. 9–11.B. R. Rees - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (01):1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-09

Total views
11 ( #770,785 of 2,349,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #239,413 of 2,349,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes