Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards

Abstract
Principle 2 of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) requires that decision-making capacity should be assumed, unless there is conclusive evidence, on a balance of probabilities, to the contrary (Department of Constitutional Affairs 2005). In his article “The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005,” Ajit Shah (2011) raises the concern that the new Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), introduced through the Mental Health Act (Department of Health 2007), conflict with this principle (henceforth, the principle of presumed capacity) because, in practice, they will encourage the routine assessment of capacity even in the absence of any positive evidence of diminished capacity ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ppp.2011.0015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history
Admin Source id: feed://125/http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/philosophy_psychiatry_and_psychology/v018/18.2.lucas.html   Serial ID: 426165
Change log    Delete without trace    Inspect

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Pragmatic Aspects of Assessing Mental Capacity.Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):133-134.
The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):111-115.
Capacity, Mental Mechanisms, and Unwise Decisions.Tim Thornton - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):127-132.
Mental Competence or Best Interests?Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):151-152.
Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value.Jules Holroyd - forthcoming - In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.
Mental Capacity and the Applied Phenomenology of Judgement.Wayne Martin & Ryan Hickerson - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):195-214.
Faulty Judgment, Expert Opinion, and Decision-Making Capacity.Michel Silberfeld & David Checkland - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4):377-393.
Conceptualization or Assessment: One at a Time or Both?Neelke Doorn - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):153-155.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-06-23

Total downloads
30 ( #199,884 of 2,261,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,246 of 2,261,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature